Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 86
Filter
1.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 34: e005, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1055521

ABSTRACT

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ionizing radiation from high energy X-ray on fluoride release, surface roughness, flexural strength, and surface chemical composition of the materials. The study groups comprised five different restorative materials: Beautifil II, GCP Glass Fill, Amalgomer CR, Zirconomer, and Fuji IX GP. Twenty disk-shaped specimens (8x2 mm) for fluoride release and 20 bar-shaped specimens (25 x 2x 2 mm) for flexural strength were prepared from each material. Each material group was divided into two subgroups: irradiated (IR) and non-irradiated (Non-IR). The specimens from IR groups were irradiated with 1.8 Gy/day for 39 days (total IR = 70.2 Gy). The amount of fluoride released into deionized water was measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode and ion analyzer after 24 hours and on days 2, 3, 7, 15, 21, 28, 35, and 39 (n = 10). The flexural strength was evaluated using the three-point bending test (n = 10). After the period of measurement of fluoride release, seven specimens (n = 7) from each group were randomly selected to evaluate surface roughness using AFM and one specimen was randomly selected for the SEM and EDS analyses. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p = 0.05). The irradiation significantly increased fluoride release and surface roughness for Amalgomer CR and Zirconomer groups (p < 0.05). No significant change in flexural strength of the materials was observed after irradiation (p > 0.05). The ionizing radiation altered the amount of fluoride release and surface roughness of only Amalgomer CR and Zirconomer. The effect could be related to the chemical compositions of materials.


Subject(s)
Apatites/radiation effects , Radiation, Ionizing , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Fluorides/chemistry , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Apatites/chemistry , Reference Values , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Zirconium/radiation effects , Zirconium/chemistry , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Statistics, Nonparametric , Composite Resins/chemistry , Flexural Strength , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry
2.
J. oral res. (Impresa) ; 8(2): 104-107, abr. 30, 2019. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1145300

ABSTRACT

Current evidence indicates that the minimum light intensity of photo curing units required to polymerize in a reliable way a composite resin, in increments of 2mm, is 300mW/cm2. The recent introduction of new generations of composite resin materials for large volume increments, partially contrasts with ISO 4049 (2009), calling for the use of light intensity of 1,000mW/cm2. Therefore, it is considered relevant to carry out periodic measurements of the emission intensity of light-curing units of clinical use. The aim of this study was to test the intensity [mW/cm2] of a representative sample of tungsten-halogen and LED photopolymerization units used in private and public health service in different areas of the Valparaíso Region in Chile. This was achieved through the use of dental radiometers, without considering the variables of intensity modification over time (either spontaneously, by undesirable inherent characteristics of the device, or by programs of intensity modification in time), or the density of accumulated power needed. This in vitro diagnostic test, evaluated a sample of 507 units, 107 halogen and 400 LED, for a period of around one month, using two radiometers as measuring instruments. For LED units the Bluephase Meter® radiometer, from Ivoclar-VivadentTM was used, and for halogen units we used the Coltolux® from ColténeTM. As a result, 85% of the LED and halogen units achieved the minimum requirements of intensity needed for the polymerization of conventional dental biomaterials. However, only 25% from the tested units achieved a power density of 1,000mW/cm2.


Subject(s)
Humans , Technology, Dental/instrumentation , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Dental Equipment , Radiometry , Chile , Halogens , Light
3.
J. appl. oral sci ; 27: e20180075, 2019. graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-975874

ABSTRACT

Abstract Currently, there is no consensus in terms of defining the minimum radiant exposure values necessary for achieving adequate properties of composite resin. In addition, the long-term influence that radiant exposure has on the properties of composite resins is still questionable. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of radiant exposure and UV accelerated aging on the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of micro-hybrid and nanofilled composite resins. Material and Methods: A nanofilled (Filtek Supreme; 3M ESPE) and a micro-hybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250; 3M ESPE) were investigated under different radiant exposures (3.75, 9, and 24 J/cm2) and UV accelerated aging protocols (0, 500, 1000, and 1500 aging hours). The degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS), modulus (M), water sorption (WS), and solubility (WL) were evaluated. The results obtained were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Comparisons were performed using a significance level of α=0.05. Results: The DC, FS, and M were found to be significantly influenced by both radiant exposure and accelerated aging time. The DC and EM increased with radiant exposure in the no-aging group (0-hour aging) for both micro-hybrid and nanofilled composites, whereas no correlation was found after accelerated aging protocols. WS and WL of micro-hybrid and nanofilled composite resins were scarcely affected by radiant exposure (p>0.05), whereas they were significantly reduced by accelerated aging (p<0.001). Conclusions: Although increasing radiant exposure affected the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of micro-hybrid and nanofilled composites, no influence on the hydrolytic degradation of the material was observed. In contrast, UV accelerated aging affected both the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of the composites.


Subject(s)
Ultraviolet Rays , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Solubility , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Water/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Analysis of Variance , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Phase Transition/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Photochemical Processes/radiation effects , Polymerization/drug effects , Flexural Strength/radiation effects
4.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 32: e122, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-974460

ABSTRACT

Abstract: The effects of tooth brushing could affect the long-term esthetic outcome of composite restorations. This study evaluated the effect of two different emission spectrum light-curing units on the surface roughness, roughness profile, topography and microhardness of bulk-fill composites after in vitro toothbrushing. Valo (multiple-peak) and Demi Ultra (single-peak) curing lights were each used for 10s to polymerize three bulk-fill resin composites: Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (FBF), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TET) and Surefil SDR Flow (SDR). After 30,000 reciprocal strokes in a toothbrushing machine, the roughness profile, surface roughness, surface morphology, and microhardness were examined. Representative SEM images were also obtained. When light-cured with the Demi Ultra, SDR showed the most loss in volume compared to the other composites and higher volume loss compared to when was light-cured with Valo. The highest surface roughness and roughness profile values were found in SDR after toothbrushing, for both light-curing units tested. FBF always had the greatest microhardness values. Light-curing TET with Valo resulted in higher microhardness compared to when using the Demi Ultra. Confocal and SEM images show that toothbrushing resulted in smoother surfaces for FBF and TET. All composites exhibited surface volume loss after toothbrushing. The loss in volume of SDR depended on the light-curing unit used. Toothbrushing can alter the surface roughness and superficial aspect of some bulk-fill composites. The choice of light-curing unit did not affect the roughness profile, but, depending on the composite, it affected the microhardness.


Subject(s)
Toothbrushing/adverse effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Surface Properties/drug effects , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Microscopy, Confocal , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Polymerization , Hardness/drug effects , Hardness/radiation effects
5.
J. appl. oral sci ; 26: e20170528, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-954505

ABSTRACT

Abstract High levels of shrinkage stress caused by volumetric variations during the activation process are one of the main problems in the practical application of composite resins. Objective The aim of this study is to reduce the shrinkage stress and minimize the effects caused by composite resin volumetric variation due to the photopolymerization. In this way, this work proposes a systematic study to determine the optimal dimming function to be applied to light curing processes. Material and Methods The study was performed by applying mathematical techniques to the optimization of nonlinear objective functions. The effectiveness of the dimming function was evaluated by monitoring the polymerization shrinkage stress during the curing process of five brands/models of composites. This monitoring was performed on a universal testing machine using two steel bases coupled in the arms of the machine where the resin was inserted and polymerized. The quality of the composites cured by the proposed method was analyzed and compared with the conventional photoactivation method by experiments to determine their degree of conversion (DC). Absorbance measurements were performed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). A T-test was performed on DC results to compare the photoactivation techniques. We also used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to analyze in-vitro the adhesion interface of the resin in human teeth. Results Our results showed that the use of the optimal dimming function, named as exponential, resulted in the significant reduction of the shrinkage stress (~36.88% ±6.56 when compared with the conventional method) without affecting the DC (t=0.86, p-value=0.44). The SEM analyses show that the proposed process can minimize or even eliminate adhesion failures between the tooth and the resin in dental restorations. Conclusion The results from this study can promote the improvement of the composite resin light curing process by the minimization of polymerization shrinkage effects, given an operational standardization of the photoactivation process.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Polymerization/radiation effects , Reference Values , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Adhesiveness , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Dental Stress Analysis , Phase Transition/radiation effects
6.
J. appl. oral sci ; 26: e20160662, 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-893738

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The main goal of this study was to compare the polymerization degree of bulk-fill giomer resin cured with three different light-curing units (LCUs): a polywave third-generation (Valo); a monowave (DemiUltra: DU); and a second-generation LED (Optima 10: Opt) LCUs by using structural and mechanical properties. Material and methods: Giomer samples of 2 and 4 mm cured with three LCUs were employed in vitro analysis. The degree of curing (DC%) was determined with Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Microstructural features were observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Flexural strength (FS), compression strength (CS), elastic modulus and fracturing strain were determined for mechanical properties. Surface microhardness (SMH) values were also measured. Oneway ANOVA, two-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison tests were used for statistically analyzing the FS and SMH. Results: DC% values were 58.2, 47.6, and 39.7 for the 2 mm samples cured with DU, Opt., and Valo LCUs, respectively. DC% values of the 4 mm samples were 50.4, 44.6, and 38.2 for DU, Opt, and Valo, respectively. SMH values were Valo, Opt<DU at top of the samples; Valo<DU, Opt at 2 mm, and DU, Valo<Opt at 4 mm depth. Giomer samples cured with Opt and DU exhibited higher FS values than Valo. CS values were similar but compressive modulus and fracturing strain (%) varied depending on the curing protocol. Conclusions: Based on the results, it can be concluded that curing device and protocol strongly affect crosslinking reactions and thus DC%, SMH, compressive modulus and strain at break values. Consequently, it can be deduced that curing protocol is possibly the most important parameter for microstructure formation of highly-filled composite restoratives because it may bring some structural defects and physical frailties on restorations due to lower degree of polymerization.


Subject(s)
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Polymerization/radiation effects , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Statistics, Nonparametric , Compressive Strength , Elastic Modulus , Hardness Tests
7.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 31(supl.1): e59, Aug. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-889456

ABSTRACT

Abstract This systematic review assessed the literature to evaluate the efficiency of polymerization of bulk-fill composite resins at 4 mm restoration depth. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched with no restrictions on year, publication status, or article's language. Selection criteria included studies that evaluated bulk-fill composite resin when inserted in a minimum thickness of 4 mm, followed by curing according to the manufacturers' instructions; presented sound statistical data; and comparison with a control group and/or a reference measurement of quality of polymerization. The evidence level was evaluated by qualitative scoring system and classified as high-, moderate- and low- evidence level. A total of 534 articles were retrieved in the initial search. After the review process, only 10 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. Most articles included (80%) were classified as high evidence level. Among several techniques, microhardness was the most frequently method performed by the studies included in this systematic review. Irrespective to the "in vitro" method performed, bulk fill RBCs were partially likely to fulfill the important requirement regarding properly curing in 4 mm of cavity depth measured by depth of cure and / or degree of conversion. In general, low viscosities BFCs performed better regarding polymerization efficiency compared to the high viscosities BFCs.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Polymerization , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Hardness , Materials Testing , Polymerization/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Time Factors
8.
Odonto (Säo Bernardo do Campo) ; 25(49): 1-8, jan.-jun. 2017. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-996266

ABSTRACT

Apesar do notável aumento de restaurações posteriores com resinas compostas nos últimos anos, ainda existem dificuldades quanto à técnica restauradora em se tratando de cavidades com envolvimento da face proximal. Considera-se que a intensidade de luz que atinge os incrementos da resina na face cervical do preparo é menor do que a intensidade próxima à superfície, podendo comprometer as propriedades mecânicas e o sucesso da restauração. Objetivo: Investigar a resistência compressiva dos incrementos de resina composta de uso direto na profundidade da caixa proximal de restaurações classe II em diferentes extensões ocluso-cervicais utilizando- se a técnica incremental proposta por Pollack (1988). Métodos: Foram obtidos 40 espécimes (blocos) de resina composta, com 2 mm de dimensão ocluso-cervical, confeccionados a partir de restaurações classe II em três molares inferiores de manequim (Prodens) com dimensões de 4 mm vestíbulo-lingual, 2 mm mésio-distal e profundidades ocluso-cervical de 2 mm (G1 e G2), 4 mm (G3) e 6 mm (G4), formando 4 grupos (n=10). Para G1 (grupo controle) foi utilizada a resina autoativada (Alpha Plast) e demais grupos resina fotoativada (Z100, 3M ESPE), todos com espessura de 2mm. Após, os espécimes foram armazenados em soro fisiológico durante 30 dias e, posteriormente,submetidos ao teste de resistência à compressão em máquina universal de ensaios EMIC DL-2000, composta por um dispositivo metálico de base plana de 15mm, com célula de carga de 490N e velocidade de 0,5mm/min, aplicada sobre a face oclusal dos espécimes até a fratura.Os resultados foram analisados pelo teste ANOVA. Resultados: A média dos valores de resistência à fratura (MPa), foram: 52,86; 48,55; 44,89; 42,67 para G1, G2, G3 e G4, respectivamente. Conclusão: Não houve diferença significativa (p>0,05) na resistência à compressão entre incrementos de resina composta inseridas na base da face proximal de preparos do tipo classe II em diferentes profundidades utilizando-se o protocolo adotado.(AU)


In spite of the remarkable increase of posterior restorations with composite resins in the last years, there are still difficulties regarding the restorative technique when dealing with cavities with involvement of the proximal face. It is considered that the light intensity that reaches the resin increments in the cervical face of the preparation is smaller than the intensity close to the surface, which may compromise the mechanical properties and the success of the restoration. Objective: To investigate the compressive strength of the composite resin increments of direct use in the depth of the proximal box of class II restorations in different occlusalcervical extensions using the incremental technique proposed by Pollack (1988). Methods: 40 composite resin specimens with 2 mm occlusal-cervical dimensions were made from class II restorations in three lower molars of the manikin (Prodens) with 4 mm vestibullary, 2 mm mesio- Distal and occlusal-cervical depths of 2 mm (G1 and G2), 4 mm (G3) and 6 mm (G4), forming 4 groups (n = 10). For G1 (control group) the autoactivated resin (Alpha Plast) and other photoactivated resin groups (Z100, 3M ESPE) were used, all with a thickness of 2mm. Afterwards, the specimens were stored in saline solution for 30 days and then submitted to the compressive strength test in a universal EMIC DL-2000 test machine, consisting of a 15mm flat base metal device with a 490N load cell And velocity of 0.5 mm / min, applied on the occlusal face of the specimens until the fracture.The results were analyzed by the ANOVA test. Results: The average values of fracture resistance (MPa) were: 52.86; 48.55; 44.89; 42.67 for G1, G2, G3 and G4, respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant difference (p> 0.05) in the compressive strength between increments of composite resin inserted at the base of the proximal face of class II type preparations at different depths using the protocol adopted.(AU)


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Reference Values , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Statistics, Nonparametric , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Compressive Strength , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods
9.
J. appl. oral sci ; 25(2): 140-146, Mar.-Apr. 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-841182

ABSTRACT

Abstract Alternative photoinitiators with different absorption wavelengths have been used in resin composites (RCs), so it is crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of light-curing units (LCUs) on these products. Objective Using Fourier transform infrared analysis (FTIR) in vitro, the effects of varying radiant exposure (RE) values generated by second and third generation LED LCUs on the degree of conversion (DC) and maximum rate of polymerization (Rpmax) of an experimental Lucirin TPO-based RC were evaluated. Material and Methods 1 mm or 2 mm thick silicon molds were positioned on a horizontal attenuated total reflectance (ATR) unit attached to an infrared spectroscope. The RC was inserted into the molds and exposed to varying REs (18, 36 and 56 J/cm2) using second (Radii Plus, SDI) and third generation LED LCUs (Bluephase G2/Ivoclar Vivadent) or a quartz tungsten based LCU (Optilux 501/SDS Kerr). FTIR spectra (n=7) were recorded for 10 min (1 spectrum/s, 16 scans/spectrum, resolution 4 cm-1) immediately after their application to the ATR. The DC was calculated using standard techniques for observing changes in aliphatic to aromatic peak ratios both prior to, and 10 min after curing, as well as during each 1 second interval. DC and Rpmax data were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test (p=0.05). Results No significant difference in DC or Rpmax was observed between the 1 mm or 2 mm thick specimens when RE values were delivered by Optilux 501 or when the 1 mm thick composites were exposed to light emitted by Bluephase G2, which in turn promoted a lower DC when 18 J/cm2 (13 s) were delivered to the 2 mm thick specimens. Radii Plus promoted DC and Rpmax values close to zero under most conditions, while the delivery of 56 J/cm2 (40 s) resulted in low DC values. Conclusions The third generation LCU provided an optimal polymerization of Lucirin TPO-based RC under most tested conditions, whereas the second generation LED-curing unit was useless regardless of the RE.


Subject(s)
Phosphines/radiation effects , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Curing Lights, Dental , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Reproducibility of Results , Analysis of Variance , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Phase Transition , Photoinitiators, Dental/chemistry , Polymerization/radiation effects
10.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 31: e65, 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952107

ABSTRACT

Abstract The effect of restoration depth on the curing time of a conventional and two bulk-fill composite resins by measuring microhardness and the respective radiosity of the bottom surface of the specimen was investigated. 1-, 3- and 5-mm thick washers were filled with Surefil SDR Flow-U (SDR), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill-IVA (TEC) or Esthet-X HD-B1 (EHD), and cured with Bluephase® G2 for 40s. Additional 1-mm washers were filled with SDR, TEC or EHD, placed above the light sensor of MARC®, stacked with pre-cured 1-, 3- or 5-mm washer of respective material, and cured for 2.5~60s to mimic 2-, 4- and 6-mm thick composite curing. The sensor measured the radiosity (EB) at the bottom of specimen stacks. Vickers hardness (VH) was measured immediately at 5 locations with triplicate specimens. Nonlinear regression of VH vs EB by VH=α[1-exp(-EB/β)] with all thickness shows that the values of α, maximum hardness, are 21.6±1.0 kg/mm2 for SDR, 38.3±0.6 kg/mm2 for TEC and 45.3±2.6 kg/mm2 for EHD, and the values of β, rate parameter, are 0.40±0.06 J/cm2 for SDR, 0.77±0.04 J/cm2 for TEC and 0.58±0.09 J/cm2 for EHD. The radiosity of the bottom surface was calculated when the bottom surface of each material attained 80% of α of each material. The curing times for each material are in agreement with manufacturer recommendation for thickness. It is possible to estimate time needed to cure composite resin of known depth adequately by the radiosity and microhardness of the bottom surface.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Composite Resins/chemistry , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Curing Lights, Dental , Radiation Dosage , Reference Values , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Linear Models , Analysis of Variance , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Resin Cements/chemistry , Polymethyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Polymethyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Polymerization , Hardness Tests
11.
J. appl. oral sci ; 24(4): 338-343, July-Aug. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-792602

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT The successful use of composite resins in Dentistry depends on physicochemical properties, but also on the biological compatibility of resins, because of the close association between pulp and dentin. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate cytotoxicity and cytokine production induced by light-cured or non-light-cured methacrylate-based and silorane composite resins in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Material and Methods Cells were stimulated with the extracts from light-cured or non-light-cured composite resins. After incubation for 24 h, cytotoxicity was assessed with the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assays, and total protein was quantified using the Lowry method. TNF-α detection was examined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) conducted with cell supernatants after cell stimulation for 6, 12, and 24 h. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test (α=0.05). Results KaloreTM and FiltekTM Silorane were cytotoxic with or without light curing (p<0.05) after 24 h of incubation. KaloreTM stimulated the early production of TNF-α in comparison with control (p<0.05), whereas FiltekTM Silorane did not affect TNF-α levels after 6 and 12 h (p>0.05). However, after 24 h FiltekTM Silorane inhibited the production of TNF-α (p<0.05). Conclusions KaloreTM and FiltekTM Silorane were cytotoxic regardless of light curing. The extract obtained from KaloreTM after 15 days of incubation stimulated the production of TNF-α, unlike that obtained from FiltekTM Silorane.


Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/analysis , Composite Resins/toxicity , Silorane Resins/toxicity , Methacrylates/toxicity , Reference Values , Time Factors , Materials Testing , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Cell Line , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Cells, Cultured , Reproducibility of Results , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Silorane Resins/radiation effects , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase , Methacrylates/radiation effects
12.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-7, 2015. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-777230

ABSTRACT

The present study aimed to assess the influence of curing distance on the loss of irradiance and power density of four curing light devices. The behavior in terms of power density of four different dental curing devices was analyzed (Valo, Elipar 2, Radii-Cal, and Optilux-401) using three different distances of photopolymerization (0 mm, 4 mm, and 8 mm). All devices had their power density measured using a MARC simulator. Ten measurements were made per device at each distance. The total amount of energy delivered and the required curing time to achieve 16 J/cm2 of energy was also calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s tests (p < 0.05). The curing distance significantly interfered with the loss of power density for all curing light devices, with the farthest distance generating the lowest power density and consequently the longer time to achieve an energy density of 16 J/cm2 (p < 0.01). Comparison of devices showed that Valo, in extra power mode, showed the best results at all distances, followed by Valo in high power mode, Valo in standard mode, Elipar 2, Radii-Cal, and Optilux-401 halogen lamp (p < 0.01). These findings indicate that all curing lights induced a significant loss of irradiance and total energy when the light was emitted farther from the probe. The Valo device in extra power mode showed the highest power density and the shortest time to achieve an energy density of 16 J/cm2 at all curing distances.


Subject(s)
Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/instrumentation , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Equipment , Materials Testing , Polymerization/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Equipment and Supplies , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors
13.
J. appl. oral sci ; 22(1): 44-51, Jan-Feb/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-699917

ABSTRACT

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Knoop hardness number (KHN) of dual-cured core build-up resin composites (DCBRCs) at 6 depths of cavity after 3 post-irradiation times by 4 light-exposure methods. Material and Methods: Five specimens each of DCBRCs (Clearfil DC Core Plus [DCP] and Unifil Core EM [UCE]) were filled in acrylic resin blocks with a semi-cylindrical cavity and light-cured using an LED light unit (power density: 1,000 mW/cm2)at the top surface by irradiation for 20 seconds (20 s), 40 seconds (40 s), bonding agent plus 20 seconds (B+20 s), or 40 seconds plus light irradiation of both sides of each acrylic resin block for 40 seconds each (120 s). KHN was measured at depths of 0.5, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 mm at 0.5 hours, 24 hours, and 7 days post-irradiation. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's compromise post-hoc test with a significance level of p<0.05. Results: For both DCBRCs, at 0.5 hours post-irradiation, the 20 s and 40 s methods showed the highest KHN at depth of 0.5 mm. The 40 s method showed significantly higher KHN than the 20 s method at all depths of cavity and post-irradiation times, except UCE at depth of 0.5 mm (p<0.05). The 120 s method did not result in significantly different KHN at all depths of cavity and post-irradiation times (p>0.05). In DCP, and not UCE, at 24 hours and 7 days post-irradiation, the B+20 s method showed significantly higher KHN at all depths of cavity, except the depth of 0.5 mm (p<0.05). Conclusion: KHN depends on the light-exposure method, use of bonding agent, depth of cavity, post-irradiation time, and material brand. Based on the microhardness behavior, DCBRCs are preferably prepared by the effective exposure method, when used for a greater depth of cavity. .


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/radiation effects , Hardness Tests , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Resin Cements/radiation effects , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/chemistry , Materials Testing , Photochemical Processes/radiation effects , Polymerization/radiation effects , Reproducibility of Results , Resin Cements/chemistry , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors
14.
J. appl. oral sci ; 21(4): 293-299, Jul-Aug/2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-684563

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the polymerization temperature of a bulk filled composite resin light-activated with various light curing modes using infrared thermography according to the curing depth and approximation to the cavity wall. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Composite resin (AeliteFlo, Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, USA) was inserted into a Class II cavity prepared in the Teflon blocks and was cured with a LED light curing unit (Dr's Light, GoodDoctors Co., Seoul, Korea) using various light curing modes for 20 s. Polymerization temperature was measured with an infrared thermographic camera (Thermovision 900 SW/TE, Agema Infra-red Systems AB, Danderyd, Sweden) for 40 s at measurement spots adjacent to the cavity wall and in the middle of the cavity from the surface to a 4 mm depth. Data were analyzed according to the light curing modes with one-way ANOVA, and according to curing depth and approximation to the cavity wall with two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The peak polymerization temperature of the composite resin was not affected by the light curing modes. According to the curing depth, the peak polymerization temperature at the depth of 1 mm to 3 mm was significantly higher than that at the depth of 4 mm, and on the surface. The peak polymerization temperature of the spots in the middle of the cavity was higher than that measured in spots adjacent to the cavity wall. CONCLUSION: In the photopolymerization of the composite resin, the temperature was higher in the middle of the cavity compared to the outer surface or at the internal walls of the prepared cavity. .


Subject(s)
Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Hot Temperature , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Polymerization/radiation effects , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/chemistry , Materials Testing , Surface Properties , Time Factors
15.
Braz. oral res ; 27(3): 286-292, May-Jun/2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-673239

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effects of the photoactivation source and restorative material on the development of caries-like lesions on human enamel after an in vitro pH challenge. Enamel cavities were prepared in 36 blocks, which were assigned to two groups according to the restorative material: resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin (CR). Samples were exposed to quartz-tungsten-halogen lamp, argon-ion laser, or light-emitting diode (n = 6). The Knoop microhardness (KHN) values of the top surface of all materials were evaluated. Restored enamel blocks were thermocycled and subjected to 10 demineralization-remineralization cycles at 37°C. KHN analysis of the superficial enamel was performed by four indentations located 100 mm from the restoration margin. The material KHN was not affected by the photoactivation source. No significant difference in KHN was noted between CR and RMGI. The enamel surface around RMGI exhibited a higher KHN (272.8 KHN) than the enamel around CR (93.3 KHN), regardless of the photoactivation source. Enamel demineralization around the dental restoration was not influenced by the photoactivation source. Less enamel demineralization was observed around the RMGI than around the CR restoration.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Dental Enamel/radiation effects , Glass Ionomer Cements/radiation effects , Tooth Demineralization/etiology , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent , Glass Ionomer Cements/chemistry , Hardness Tests , Materials Testing , Photochemical Processes , Surface Properties/radiation effects , Time Factors
16.
J. appl. oral sci ; 21(2): 157-162, Mar-Apr/2013. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-674357

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study evaluated the effect of temperature and curing time on composite sorption and solubility. Material and Methods: Seventy five specimens (8×2 mm) were prepared using a commercial composite resin (ICE, SDI). Three temperatures (10°C, 25°C and 60°C) and five curing times (5 s, 10 s, 20 s, 40 s and 60 s) were evaluated. The specimens were weighed on an analytical balance three times: A: before storage (M1); B: 7 days after storage (M2); C: 7 days after storage plus 1 day of drying (M3). The storage solution consisted of 75% alcohol/25% water. Sorption and solubility were calculated using these three weights and specimen dimensions. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U Tests (α=5%). Results: The results showed that time, temperature and their interaction influenced the sorption and solubility of the composite (p<0.05). At 60°C, the composite sorption showed an inverse relationship with the curing time (p<0.05). The composite cured for 5 s showed higher sorption for the 40 s or 60 s curing times when compared with all temperatures (p<0.05). Curing times of 20 s and 40 s showed similar sorption data for all temperatures (p>0.05). The 60°C composite temperature led to lower values of sorption for all curing times when compared with the 10°C temperature (p<0.05). The same results were found when comparing 10°C and 25°C (p<0.05), except that the 20 s and 40 s curing times behaved similarly (p>0.05). Solubility was similar at 40 s and 60 s for all temperatures (p>0.05), but was higher at 10°C than at 60°C for all curing times (p<0.05). When the composite was cured at 25°C, similar solubility values were found when comparing the 5 s and 10 s or 20 s and 40 s curing times (p>0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, higher temperatures or longer curing times led to lower sorption and solubility values for the composite tested; however, this trend was only significant in specific combinations of temperature and curing times.


Subject(s)
Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/chemistry , Polymerization/radiation effects , Absorption , Adsorption , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Materials Testing , Reference Values , Solubility , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface Properties , Temperature , Time Factors
17.
J. appl. oral sci ; 21(2): 190-195, Mar-Apr/2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-674365

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study evaluated the variation of conversion degree (DC) in the 12 hours following initial photoactivation of a low-shrinkage composite resin (Venus Diamond). Material and Methods: The conversion degree was monitored for 12 hours using Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) F-TIR Spectroscopy. The composite was placed in 1 or 2 mm rings and cured for 10 or 20 seconds with a LED lamp. ATR spectra were acquired from the bottom surface of each sample immediately after the initial photoactivation (P=0), 30 minutes (P=0.5) and 12 hours after photoactivation (P=12) in order to obtain the DC progression during the post-curing period. Interactions between thickness (T), irradiation time (I) and post-curing (P) on the DC were calculated through ANOVA testing. Results: All the first order interactions were statistically significant, with the exception of the T-P interaction. Furthermore, the shift from P=0 to P=0.5 had a statistically higher influence than the shift from P=0.5 to P=12. The post-curing period played a fundamental role in reaching higher DC values with the low-shrinkage composite resin tested in this study. Moreover, both the irradiation time and the composite thickness strongly influenced the DC. Conclusions: Increased irradiation time may be useful in obtaining a high conversion degree (DC) with a low-shrinkage nano-hybrid composite resin, particularly with 2 mm composite layers.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Nanocomposites/radiation effects , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/chemistry , Materials Testing , Nanocomposites/chemistry , Phase Transition , Polymerization/radiation effects , Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared , Surface Properties , Time Factors
18.
J. appl. oral sci ; 20(6): 603-606, Nov.-Dec. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-660629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the influence of the cavity configuration factor ("C-Factor") and light activation technique on polymerization contraction forces of a Bis-GMA-based composite resin (Charisma, Heraeus Kulzer). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three different pairs of steel moving bases were connected to a universal testing machine (emic DL 500): groups A and B - 2x2 mm (CF=0.33), groups C and D - 3x2 mm (CF=0.66), groups e and F - 6x2 mm (CF=1.5). After adjustment of the height between the pair of bases so that the resin had a volume of 12 mm³ in all groups, the material was inserted and polymerized by two different methods: pulse delay (100 mW/cm² for 5 s, 40 s interval, 600 mW/cm² for 20 s) and continuous pulse (600 mW/cm² for 20 s). Each configuration was light cured with both techniques. Tensions generated during polymerization were recorded by 120 s. The values were expressed in curves (Force(N) x Time(s)) and averages compared by statistical analysis (ANOVA and Tukey's test, p<0.05). RESULTS: For the 2x2 and 3x2 bases, with a reduced C-Factor, significant differences were found between the light curing methods. For 6x2 base, with high C-Factor, the light curing method did not influence the contraction forces of the composite resin. CONCLUSIONS: Pulse delay technique can determine less stress on tooth/restoration interface of adhesive restorations only when a reduced C-Factor is present.


Subject(s)
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/radiation effects , Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives/methods , Polymerization/radiation effects , Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Stress Analysis , Materials Testing , Reference Values , Time Factors
19.
J. appl. oral sci ; 20(5): 576-580, Sept.-Oct. 2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-654924

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple layers of an infection control barrier on the micro-hardness of a composite resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One, two, four, and eight layers of an infection control barrier were used to cover the light guides of a high-power light emitting diode (LeD) light curing unit (LCU) and a low-power halogen LCU. The composite specimens were photopolymerized with the LCUs and the barriers, and the micro-hardness of the upper and lower surfaces was measured (n=10). The hardness ratio was calculated by dividing the bottom surface hardness of the experimental groups by the irradiated surface hardness of the control groups. The data was analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. RESULTS: The micro-hardness of the composite specimens photopolymerized with the LED LCU decreased significantly in the four- and eight-layer groups of the upper surface and in the two-, four-, and eight-layer groups of the lower surface. The hardness ratio of the composite specimens was <80% in the eight-layer group. The micro-hardness of the composite specimens photopolymerized with the halogen LCU decreased significantly in the eight-layer group of the upper surface and in the two-, four-, and eight-layer groups of the lower surface. However, the hardness ratios of all the composite specimens photopolymerized with barriers were <80%. CONCLUSIONS: The two-layer infection control barrier could be used on high-power LCUs without decreasing the surface hardness of the composite resin. However, when using an infection control barrier on the low-power LCUs, attention should be paid so as not to sacrifice the polymerization efficiency.


Subject(s)
Humans , Curing Lights, Dental , Composite Resins/chemistry , Infection Control, Dental/methods , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Hardness Tests , Materials Testing , Polymerization , Surface Properties , Time Factors
20.
Braz. oral res ; 26(3): 249-255, May-June 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-622941

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the influence of photoactivation method and hydrophobic resin (HR) application on the marginal and internal adaptation, hardness (KHN), and crosslink density (CLD) of a resin-based fissure sealant. Model fissures were created in bovine enamel fragments (n = 10) and sealed using one of the following protocols: no adhesive system + photoactivation of the sealant using continuous light (CL), no adhesive system + photoactivation of the sealant using the soft-start method (SS), HR + CL, or HR + SS. Marginal and internal gaps and KHN were assessed after storage in water for 24 h. The CLD was indirectly assessed by repeating the KHN measurement after 24 h of immersion in 100% ethanol. There was no difference among the samples with regard to marginal or internal adaptation. The KHN and CLD were similar for samples cured using either photoactivation method. Use of a hydrophobic resin prior to placement of fissure sealants and curing the sealant using the soft-start method may not provide any positive influence on integrity or crosslink density.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Polymerization , Pit and Fissure Sealants/chemistry , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins/radiation effects , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Enamel/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/radiation effects , Hardness Tests , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives , Materials Testing , Pit and Fissure Sealants/radiation effects , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface Properties , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL